Applied Behavior Analysis: Difference between revisions
Fire Eider (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | |||
'''Applied Behavior Analysis''', or '''ABA''' (not to be confused with the American Board Association) is called the "gold standard" for ASD by ABA, despite all the studies to the contrary. | '''Applied Behavior Analysis''', or '''ABA''' (not to be confused with the American Board Association) is called the "gold standard" for ASD by ABA, despite all the studies to the contrary. | ||
Revision as of 11:15, 24 August 2022
This page or section is a stub. Perhaps you can help add something to it? 😊
Applied Behavior Analysis, or ABA (not to be confused with the American Board Association) is called the "gold standard" for ASD by ABA, despite all the studies to the contrary.
History of ABA
History of ABA (e.g. Ole Ivar Løvaas), its development alongside Gay and Trans Conversion Therapy.
View on it
The autism community (mostly parents of autistic children) tend to push this "therapy" while the Autistic Community (autistics themselves) tend to vehemently oppose it.
Advocates for ABA tend to say, "That's the old ABA! The new ABA is kind and gentle!" There is a multitude of problems here, not the least of which is the ones saying this are often ABA providers/workers (aka, conflict of interest). Also, this is similar to the Moving Goalpost fallacy, where those in the "new ABA" are too young to speak up (even online), and by the time they can speak up, what they went through will be considered "old ABA".
Maybe insert studies here refuting it, such as the Department of Defense's recent report on it, etc. Also, add a section for the Judge Rotenberg Center
